BFI Energy Group
BFI Energy Group
  • Home
  • President's Message
  • About BFI
  • Services
    • Seismic Data Processing
    • Depth Imaging
    • Full-Waveform Inversion
    • Data Conditioning
    • VSP Integrated Study
    • Seismic Interpretation
    • Petrophysical Study
    • Reservoir Modeling
  • News
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Home
    • President's Message
    • About BFI
    • Services
      • Seismic Data Processing
      • Depth Imaging
      • Full-Waveform Inversion
      • Data Conditioning
      • VSP Integrated Study
      • Seismic Interpretation
      • Petrophysical Study
      • Reservoir Modeling
    • News
    • Contact Us
  • Home
  • President's Message
  • About BFI
  • Services
    • Seismic Data Processing
    • Depth Imaging
    • Full-Waveform Inversion
    • Data Conditioning
    • VSP Integrated Study
    • Seismic Interpretation
    • Petrophysical Study
    • Reservoir Modeling
  • News
  • Contact Us

Depth Imaging & Velocity Model Building

PSDM stack with initial (top) and final (bottom) velocity model: better continuity

Why depth imaging

Where structures are complex, lateral velocity changes are strong or targets are small, time processing cannot place reflectors correctly and PSTM cannot fully correct mispositioning. Pre-stack depth migration corrects the image distortions caused by steep strata and velocity changes.

Depth-imaging toolkit

Kirchhoff pre-stack depth migration, reverse time migration (RTM), Gaussian beam migration, wave-equation (eGWM) and generalised Radon (GRT) migration, anisotropic VTI/TTI depth imaging, and velocity model building with Constrained Velocity Inversion (CVI) and grid tomography.

Interpretive velocity model building

Horizon interpretation is the basis of the model. Working with the geologists, horizons are tracked from shallow to deep on continuous events, preferably velocity interfaces. We build a structural model with TTI anisotropy where needed, use velocities that belong to individual rock units, and test model scenarios against seismic diagnostics and geological input.

Measuring image quality objectively

Image fidelity is measured objectively as a function of velocity, not judged by eye: residual moveout and local stack power on the migrated gathers, and event coherence and image-simplicity measures such as Varimax on the image cube. Structural velocity-consistency constraints are applied throughout.

Case study: onshore 3D PSTM / PSDM

A full onshore 3D project from initial model to final tomographic update. The initial model was built from PSTM velocities with CVI rather than a Dix conversion. Two iterations of grid tomography followed, with residual-moveout picking on a 1000 m x 500 m grid and travel-time errors measured up to 35 degrees, steered by dip, azimuth and continuity attributes so the model followed the geology.

From PSTM to PSDM to RTM

Moving from PSTM to PSDM to RTM, geometric accuracy and sensitivity to the velocity model both increase. Where the model is uncertain, PSTM and PSDM give complementary views, while RTM suffers from model error. Anisotropic depth migration gives the most accurate positioning, but only as accurate as the velocity model, which is why geological input matters.

Copyright © 2026 BFI Energy Group - All Rights Reserved.

Seismic imaging & FWI | Newmarket, ON, Canada

  • Home
  • About BFI
  • Seismic Data Processing
  • Depth Imaging
  • Full-Waveform Inversion
  • Data Conditioning
  • VSP Integrated Study
  • Seismic Interpretation
  • Petrophysical Study
  • Reservoir Modeling
  • Contact Us

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept